Skip to Content

Share

Rafia Zakaria: Curse of the Bomb

May 31, 2011

Bookmark and Share


The bomb that was supposed to deter and defeat has been unable to frighten anyone into leaving Pakistan alone.

By **Rafia Zakaria**

From Dawn.com.

Rafia Zakaria small.jpgIt is said that Pakistan was born on Aug 14, 1947. But like other hazy snapshots in the tampered-with album of our wishful history, this fact, nurtured through rote and repetition, has faltered under the weight of reality.

If the fervor of homage and sacrifice is a reason to reconfigure Pakistan’s creation story, then the country was actually born on May 28, 1998. On that day, Pakistan announced it had carried out five successful nuclear tests; patriotism in Pakistan would henceforth be defined as a belief in the power to kill millions.

Since that day, a large section of Pakistanis have dutifully worshipped their bomb, imagining in its capacity to destroy, a safety that would insulate them from incursions by nosy neighbors and meddling powers, from wars that would chip off territory and skirmishes that would disrespect borders.

The bomb will save us, they believed, it will sustain us in these trying times (we cannot be backward if we have the bomb) and save us from trying too hard (who needs a super economy if you have a super bomb?). In times of trouble and fear, when watching the bombing elsewhere—a punished Baghdad amidst its dusty ruins, a desolate Kabul with its bombed-out streets—these Pakistanis turned to the bomb for comfort, however elusive.

But like so many other things—infrastructure and institutions, roads and rituals—the bomb too has failed Pakistan. In the past month, Pakistan’s borders have been casually ignored, security walls scaled and planes destroyed—all this despite the possession of the omnipotent trump card residing at the sacred altar of our national consciousness.

The bomb that was supposed to deter and defeat has been unable to frighten anyone into leaving us alone. It has revealed, instead, the flimsy remains of our national pride and a confused, conspiracy-infested mental landscape. Never united otherwise, Pakistanis can now share the heartbreak of knowing that they were never invincible after all, that a few men could easily outwit and outsmart, and that situating their self-worth in a bomb is exacting an infinitely bloody price.

As long as Pakistanis continue to rely on conspiracy to rationalize the collage of military failures and cling to denial and delusion the curse of the bomb will not be revealed.

No longer cosseted by the myth of a cure-all weapon, the bomb like an unveiled bride must be assessed in the fluorescence of a depressing and unwelcome day. It was widely known to have been procured through deception and disguise, lies and falsehoods. The man, who developed it, was chastised publicly and heroised privately, despite what some saw as his mendacity.

These sins we forgave, unwilling to recognise their potent if silent attack on national morality now poised to elevate someone accused of selling nuclear technology and promoting proliferation. It is poised to accept that it is entirely forgivable to sacrifice what is right for what is needed and most damningly that the power to destroy is more venerable than the power to befriend and create.

The losses brought by the bomb would likely be forgiven by Pakistanis if they were moral concerns alone. In the cold estimations of post-Soviet calculations, nuclear power was a deterrent, its possession meant that others would stay away, that possession alone equaled power, especially for small countries with few friends.

However, in the era of terrorism, where every living thing is a target and the propagation of fear is a means to control, a markedly different equation of nuclear power is in operation. Under its deductions, weak states with nuclear weapons attract rather than deter non-state enemies. Ideologically motivated non-state actors see weak countries as easily penetrable targets which can provide access to nuclear capabilities that would make the absence of territorial control largely irrelevant.

While the weapon caches of countries like the U.S. are impenetrable to such groups, those of weak countries are perceived as achievable. In simple terms, there is a school of thought that Al Qaeda and similar groups will not stop targeting Pakistan as long as it possesses the nuclear bomb. In fact, maintaining the power to destroy might well mean the slow but sure destruction of the country itself.

Non-state terror groups are not alone in bestowing unwanted attention on Pakistan. Superpowers, both existing and emergent, have their own interests in the bomb, and fears that Pakistan may not be able to keep its assets secure could well increase their efforts to meddle with and muddy existing configurations. These fears do not appear far-fetched if little more than a couple of ladders, dark clothing, and crossing a stream is needed to enter a naval base and wreak havoc on men and material.

If defenses are seen as so fragile and security so decrepit then the concerns of those that have much to lose cannot simply be shaken off with the blind faith bestowed on the military in decades past.

Pakistanis have done a lot for the bomb; in the six squabbling decades of a meager existence they have sacrificed education, water, sanitation, and even the patched-together shreds of a national conscience to fund and fuel the military machine that birthed the bomb.

As long as Pakistanis continue to rely on conspiracy to rationalize the collage of military failures and cling to denial and delusion the curse of the bomb will not be revealed. Perhaps the 30,000 dead Pakistanis, the young brave faces of martyred naval commandos, the lined-up bodies outside mosques, will provoke the question of what the bomb, so unconditionally loved, has really given Pakistan.

Copyright 2011 Rafia Zakaria

________________________________________________________________________

This post originally appeared at DAWN.COM.

Rafia Zakaria is a U.S.-based attorney and teaches constitutional law and political philosophy.

To read blog entries from Rafia Zakaria and others at GUERNICA click HERE .

  Tom Engelhardt: Bored to Death in Afghanistan (and Washington): Mating Déjà Vu with a Mobius Strip in the Graveyard of Empire: If nobody told you otherwise, you could easily believe that almost every breaking Afghan story in the last four weeks came from some previous year of the war. More
 
  Fatima Bhutto: A Flood of Drone Stikes: What the Wikileaks revelations tell us about how Washington runs Pakistan. More
     
  Nick Turse: Obama’s Reset: Arab Spring or Same Old Thing?: How the President and the Pentagon Prop Up Both Middle Eastern Despots and American Arms Dealers: The Pentagon is leaning ever more heavily on rich rulers in the Arab world to prop up the military-corporate complex at home. More
 
  Tom Engelhardt: Osama bin Laden’s American Legacy: It’s Time to Stop Celebrating and Go Back to Kansas: When the celebrations and partying over his death fade…we’ll once again be left with the tattered American world bin Laden willed us. More

SUBSCRIBE TO GUERNICA’S RSS FEED

Readers like you make Guernica possible. Please show your support.

Tagged with:

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterAdd to BufferShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUpon
Submit to redditShare on App.netShare via email

You might also like

  • Rafia Zakaria: Drones and DemocracyRafia Zakaria: Drones and Democracy  As American troops withdraw from Afghanistan, we must realize the departure is only the end of the War on Terror. There is a larger, invisible war that will quickly take its place.
  • Rafia Zakaria: Drones and Hot PursuitRafia Zakaria: Drones and Hot Pursuit Having poured millions into the pockets of the Pakistani military and the civilian government, the US sees itself as having purchased the right to go wherever and whenever it wants, and kill whoeve...
  • Rafia Zakaria: A Dangerous NarrativeRafia Zakaria: A Dangerous Narrative  This is the central contradiction that remains invisible to the American public: While the U.S. engages in talks and deals with the same Taliban that Pakistan is accused of canoodling with, t...
  • Rafia Zakaria: A Modest Proposal for Reinventing the BurqaRafia Zakaria: A Modest Proposal for Reinventing the Burqa  A satirical suggestion that, under the shelter of the burqa, Pakistani women may discover bitter humor in despair.

Leave a comment




Anti-Spam Quiz:

Subscribe without commenting