Skip to Content

Share

Robert Reich: Obama as Commander-in-Chief, Romney as Banal Bully

October 24, 2012

In last night's debate, Obama made his dominance clear.

http://www.guernicamag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/2834336512_dbe713595a.jpeg
Image from Flickr via BeckyF

By Robert Reich
By arrangement with Robert Reich.

I thought the third and last presidential debate was a clear win for the President. He displayed the authority of the nation’s Commander-in-Chief—calm, dignified, and confident. He was assertive without being shrill, clear without being condescending. He explained to a clueless Mitt Romney the way the world actually works.

Romney seemed out of his depth. His arguments were more a series of bromides than positions – “we have to make sure arms don’t get into the wrong hands,” “we want a peaceful planet,” “we need to stand by our principles,” “we need strong allies,” “we need a comprehensive strategy to move the world away from terrorism,” and other banalities.

He came off as more subtle and convincing than Romney—more authoritative—because, in reality, he is.

This has been Romney’s problem all along, of course, but in the first debate he managed to disguise his vacuousness with a surprisingly combative, well-rehearsed performance. By the second debate, the disguise was wearing thin.

In tonight’s debate, Romney seemed to wither —and wander. He often had difficulty distinguishing his approach from the President’s, except to say, repeatedly, “America needs strong leadership.”

On the few occasions when Romney managed to criticize the President, he called for a more assertive foreign policy – but he never specified exactly what that assertiveness would entail. He wanted “tougher economic sanctions on Iran,” for example, or “stronger support for Israel”—the details of which were never revealed.

Obama’s most targeted criticism of Romney, on the other hand, went to Romney’s core weakness – that Romney’s positions have been inconsistent, superficial, and often wrong: “Every time you’ve offered an opinion,” said Obama, “you’ve been wrong.”

Nonetheless, I kept wishing Obama would take more credit for one of the most successful foreign policies of any administration in decades: not only finding and killing Osama bin Laden but also ridding the world of Libya’s Gaddafi without getting drawn into a war, imposing extraordinary economic hardship on Iran, isolating Syria, and navigating the treacherous waters of Arab Spring.

Obama pointed to these achievements, but I thought he could have knitted them together into an overall approach to world affairs that has been in sharp contrast to the swaggering, bombastic foreign policies of his predecessor.

Like George W. Bush, Mitt Romney has a pronounced tendency to rush to judgment—to assert America’s military power too quickly, and to assume that we’ll be viewed as weak if we use diplomacy and seek the cooperation of other nations (including Russia and China) before making our moves.

President Obama won tonight’s debate not only because he knows more about foreign policy than does Mitt Romney, but because Obama understands how to wield the soft as well as the hard power of America. He came off as more subtle and convincing than Romney—more authoritative—because, in reality, he is.

Although tonight’s topic was foreign policy, I hope Americans understand it was also about every other major challenge we face. Mitt Romney is not only a cold warrior; he’s also a class warrior. And the two are closely related. Romney tries to disguise both within an amenable demeanor. But in both capacities, he’s a bully.

By arrangement with Robert Reich.

Author Image

Robert B. Reich, one of the nation’s leading experts on work and the economy, is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton.

Time Magazine has named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including his latest best-seller, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future; The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism which has been translated into 22 languages; and his newest, an e-book, Beyond Outrage. His syndicated columns, television appearances, and public radio commentaries reach millions of people each week. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, and Chairman of the citizen’s group Common Cause. His widely-read blog can be found at www.robertreich.org.

Readers like you make Guernica possible. Please show your support.

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterAdd to BufferShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrSubmit to StumbleUpon
Submit to redditShare on App.netShare via email

You might also like

One comment for Robert Reich: Obama as Commander-in-Chief, Romney as Banal Bully

  1. Comment by Mila Lewis on October 24, 2012 at 10:40 pm

    While I agree with Mr Reich that Obama is more “subtle” in his approach to foreign relations the results of this subtlety have, nonetheless, been just as devastating to the peoples of the countries affected. Perhaps he needs to visit Libya and talk to the Libyan people themselves to see just how “successful” this Obama subtlety has been.

    It beggars belief how anyone with Mr Reich’s intelligence and knowledge can so blatantly ignore the fact that Libya today is worse off than it ever was under Gaddafi.

    Gaddafi, like Saddam Hussein, might have been a “monster”… but Libya, just like Iraq, is in the hands of worse monsters. The fact that they happen to be OUR monsters doesn’t magically exonerate them from their evil doing. Neither does it make Obama’s subtlety any less devastating to the people of those countries than the “swaggering, bombastic foreign policies of his predecessor.”

    I expected more from Mr Reich.

Leave a comment




Anti-Spam Quiz:

Subscribe without commenting